We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CollaborativeEYE. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://collaborativeeye.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.


You are now leaving Collaborative EYE and will be taken to www.evolvemeded.com

Supplement | Editorially independent content supported with advertising by

Intraoperative Aberrometry for Managing Astigmatism

This is the only tool for directly determining net corneal power after the cataract incision has been made and the nucleus has been removed.

I was already performing research on the cause of variations in surgically induced astigmatism when the institution where I work purchased an intraoperative aberrometer (ORA System; Alcon) in April 2016. At that time, I was also learning more about the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on refractive results. Naturally, I began using intraoperative aberrometry as part of my efforts to fine-tune my surgical outcomes.

I have found that surgically induced astigmatism can vary from case to case and that the relaxing effect of the cataract incision may not be along the plane of that incision. In other words, it is not possible to use the cataract incision to decrease astigmatism with any kind of accuracy or consistency. Intraoperative aberrometry is the only means by which to directly measure the exact impact of the cataract incision and the power of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea. I rely on this instrument for making my final selection of a toric IOL power in the OR and for refining the IOL’s alignment to minimize residual astigmatism. Two very different cases show the breadth of how useful intraoperative aberrometry can be for customizing astigmatism management.


A 68-year-old woman came to see me for a cataract surgery evaluation. Upon examination, the patient’s UCVA measured 20/80 OD and 20/60 OS, and her BCVA was plano -4.75 × 180º = 20/60 OD and +1.50 -4.50 × 178º = 20/50 OS. She had a 2+ to 3+ nuclear sclerotic cataract in her right eye and a 2+ nuclear sclerotic cataract in her left eye (Figure 1). Biometry measurements revealed that the patient had a greater amount of with-the-rule astigmatism in both eyes, confirmed by corneal topography (Figure 2), than is correctable by a toric IOL alone, 5.43 D @ 88º OD and 5.36 D @ 84º OS. I therefore recommended a combination of a toric lens implant with possible limbal relaxing incisions. The patient agreed and opted for standard rather than laser cataract surgery. To further refine the astigmatic treatment, I discussed with her using intraoperative aberrometry to guide my surgical plan, including IOL selection.

Figure 1. Preoperative biometry with the Lenstar (Haag-Streit).

Figure 2. Corneal topography.

I operated on the patient’s right eye first. Intraoperative aberrometry found 4.72 D of astigmatism at 116º and confirmed the preoperative toric calculator recommendation of the 19.50 D model T9 AcrySof IQ Toric IOL (Alcon). After inserting the IOL and optimizing its axial alignment, 1.80 D astigmatism remained. Using intraoperative aberrometry to guide my relaxing incisions, I was able to reduce the final pseudophakic reading to -0.45 D with astigmatism of 0.90 D @ 116º.

Postoperatively, the patient did very well, with 20/20 UCVA at her final 1-month postoperative visit. Her final refraction was +0.25 D sphere and a keratometry reading of 43.77/49.2 @ 89º (5.43).


A 79-year-old man presented with a complaint of a progressive decline in vision. The patient had a BCVA of 20/30 OU with a refraction of +1.25 -2.00 × 120º OD and a refraction of +1.50 -1.25 × 81º OS that decreased to 20/60 OD and 20/100 OS with glare testing. The astigmatism in his left eye was against the rule, 1.07 D @ 174º (Figure 3). The patient chose to undergo laser cataract surgery and implantation of the AcrySof IQ Restor Multifocal Toric IOL (Alcon).

Figure 3. Preoperative biometry with the Lenstar.

Preoperatively, the Barrett Toric Calculator identified the axis of astigmatism at 176º. After the laser portion of the cataract procedure, the intraoperative aphakic aberrometry reading confirmed the preoperative toric power. During the pseudophakic alignment of the toric IOL, however, I changed the preoperative axial recommendation of 176º to the 170º axis, with predicted residual astigmatism of 0.23 D × 143º. Postoperatively, the patient had residual astigmatism of 0.25 D and a UCVA of 20/20 in the operated eye. His final refraction was +0.25 -0.25 × 103º, and the keratometry reading was 44.12/45.18 @ 169º (1.08).


  • To learn to trust the aberrometer, use it in every case until you understand when it serves you well and when it does not. Do not change your treatment plan at all. Just read the results from the aberrometer, and see what it is doing. During this time, you can learn to understand the screenshots, the fringe pattern during good fixation, and the warning signs that can pop up and get comfortable measuring the IOP with a Barraquer tonometer.
  • Aberrometers may not be able to obtain accurate measurements in eyes with irregular astigmatism or irregular surface disease such as Salzmann nodular degeneration or anterior basement membrane dystrophy.
  • Once scrubbed in, you will be unable to control the machine directly in the OR. Designate an aberrometry champion in the OR who understands how the machine works and how to operate the various screens for capturing measurements. The better your champion is, the easier it will be for you to decide when to capture an image or follow the aberrometer’s recommendation. You may want an aberrometry champion in your clinic as well, and that staff member should thoroughly understand the device and data entry.
  • Patient fixation is key to successful aberrometry readings. The device therefore may not be an option in patients who have nystagmus or who have limited central vision such as those with macular degeneration and previous macular holes. Even large vitreous floaters can be impediments.
  • Lubricate and protect the ocular surface to optimize aberrometry measurements. Limit exposure and thus drying. Minimize patients’ use of medications that may be toxic to the ocular surface. Cut the drapes carefully to ensure that they are adequately recessed. If the material encroaches on the field and covers any of the cornea, it can influence aberrometry readings. Likewise, an overly tight lid speculum can affect astigmatism measurements. Lifting the speculum off the globe, wiping the cul-de-sac of balanced salt solution or OVD, and measuring the IOP are critical for consistent, reliable measurements.
  • Guard against oversedation. Early on, my patients were too somnolent to fixate on the aberrometer’s little red light. I had to train my nurse anesthetists that light sedation is required for cases in which I will use intraoperative aberrometry.
  • Properly positioning the patient’s head is critical to accurate measurements. For example, a head tucked in toward the chest can cause the upper eyelid to exert pressure on the cornea, which will produce misleading values. If the head is rotated too far to the right or left, the bridge of the nose can partially obstruct the machine.
Robin Vann, MD
  • Medical Director, Duke Eye Center Operating Rooms, Durham, North Carolina
  • robin.vann@duke.edu
  • Financial disclosure: Consultant (Alcon)